NFL GridIron Gab Daily Digest |
- Have you gotten NFL Draft Fever yet?
- Rams won’t have the first pick inked come draft night
- Eagles looking to trade up for a safety?
- Redskins QB Campbell not at camp, but still studying playbook
- Pierre-Paul, Others pay the Giants a visit
- Don’t be shocked if the Bengals surprise on draft day
- Don’t get excited Cards fans – Roethlisberger’s not coming to Arizona
- Williams’ Go Two-for-Two in Seattle: After Signing Mike Williams, Seahawks Sign Reggie
- Dolphins ship former first-round WR Ginn to San Fran
Have you gotten NFL Draft Fever yet? Posted: 16 Apr 2010 04:54 PM PDT
In review of the Raiders off-season moves… Donovan McNabb was never close coming to the Black Hole. The Eagles used the rumor to get teams to negotiate and got the most they could. McNabb would have made the Raiders an 8 or 9 win team this upcoming year and possibly the playoffs the year after. My gut still says it is better that the Raiders didn't get him. The remainder of the moves…welcome back Chris Cooper and a hearty goodbye to Brandon Marshall going to the AFC East!!! The only move that makes sense to make between now and the draft is to give up their 2nd round pick and get Jared Gaither. Get a young OL that fills an immediate hole that betters the team, it is a no brainer. With the Raiders 1st round pick, only 5 players that are worth a Top 10 Pick. Eric Berry, Ndamukong Suh, Gerald McCoy, Russell Okung and Rolando McClain. Not Sam Bradford, Jimmy Clausen, Trent Williams, Bruce Campbell, Dez Bryant, or any other names that have been "mocked" with the Raiders. Both Suh and McCoy fill a big hole in the middle, but they will be gone in the Top 5. Chances are 1% that either is available for the Raiders. Berry is the best player in the draft. If teams like KC Chiefs, Seattle Seahawks and Cleveland Browns let him pass by, the Raiders need to get him. He is likely to be a 5+ time Pro-Bowler in the Ed Reed mold, I believe the hype because it is legit. Chances are 15% that is available for the Raiders. Okung is the best OL in the draft. Most likely he goes to the Washington Redskins to protect McNabb. He is the only one worth a Top 10 pick, not the others that have been bantered. Chances are 15% that he is available for the Raiders. McClain is the best LB in the draft. The Raiders LB's are overrated; they have speed but do not make tackles or plays. Even after Richard Seymour joined the team and took on double teams, that group did not produce one bit. There is a reason the Raiders were willing to give up Kirk Morrison for a 3rd round pick, which should have been no surprise. McClain is not ranked by anyone to go in the Top 10, but he is a difference maker that comes from a coach that taught the NFL pro system. Chances are 100% that he is available for the Raiders. If any of the above 5 guys are wearing the Silver and Black next year, this will have been a great draft. They will have gotten a Top 5 talent with the 8th pick and gotten an immediate starter with Pro Bowl capabilities. Take either a Brian Price or Terrence Cody in Round 2, and the draft will have been a massive success. Why do I get the feeling though that I'll hear "With the 8th pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Oakland Raiders select Demaryius Thomas, WR Georgia Tech"…. |
Rams won’t have the first pick inked come draft night Posted: 16 Apr 2010 03:45 PM PDT
In this day and age of holdouts, it’s taking a pretty big chance not having that player under contract, but the Rams don’t seem to be overly concerned about it, and seem to be ready to make the pick thinking that player will be in on day one of training camp. |
Eagles looking to trade up for a safety? Posted: 16 Apr 2010 03:34 PM PDT There was already plenty of talk about the Eagles trading up to take a player, but now there's even more hype since Peter King said he believes the Eagles will trade up to take a safety, either Eric Berry or Earl Thomas. Let me first start off by saying that I've never been a big fan of Peter King. Maybe it's because of all the times he projected the Eagles to win the Super Bowl before the season even started or maybe just because I feel like everything he speculates never comes true (see Super Bowl predictions mentioned above). Being in the spotlight at Sports Illustrated, everything King says gets amplified which may or may not be a good thing. As much as I'd LOVE to see Eric Berry land with the Eagles, I'm not convinced the Eagles are ready to make that much of a splash. If they do make a move to try and get Berry, I think it will invovle trading the 24th overall selection and their first round pick next year (they may get other things in return but I think the two first rounders will have to come into play). They do have 11 picks in this years draft that they could make a super bundle out of but they need to get more than just one player early (first two rounds) in this draft. Trading up for Earl Thomas seems to make more sense. There would be less to give up and he's still a solid player. The problem with trading up for one of these players is that you can't wait too long. You have to have an idea of other teams interest in the player and not let someone pounce on your target before you do. Looking at Berry and Thomas, I think they are both players who can have great NFL careers and I would love to have one or the other. However, only time will tell if it will all work out in the Eagles' favor. |
Redskins QB Campbell not at camp, but still studying playbook Posted: 16 Apr 2010 03:31 PM PDT The Post this morning has reported that even though Jason Campbell as gone ahead and studied coach Shanahan's offensive playbook, he won't be showing up for voluntary minicamp any time soon. [via]
Would you study up for a test and then make it clear to the teacher you don't intend to show up to take it? That's essentially what Jason Campbell is doing by not participating in these voluntary workouts. So why even bother cracking the books to begin with? Just incase you have no other options? Whether the players, or the players agents realize what's being said here through inaction… I'm not sure. But what is perceived by the collective consciousness of the fans is that details of one's contract are more important than the teams collective goal to win. And the message one sends by not attending the workouts, whether it be Campbell or Haynesworth – is this: I DON'T CARE ABOUT THIS TEAM WINNING. That may not be what players feel, say, or actually want to project in any way… verbally or non-verbally. But you know what? ACTIONS speak louder than words. Not showing up to put the time in on the field with your teammates is what matters. Learning the new offense and getting as many reps as possible is what matters — and if you're honest with yourself then the process of trying to get better collectively as a team, whenever you have the opportunity to do so, that is the priority. A leader does that. A good quarterback does that. A good teammate DOES THAT. 80% of success in life is just showing up — Woody Allen. On this team, in this situation, when the needs are this dire — we should expect no less than 110% from the Redskins players. To me, there is no excuse. Not being contractually obligated to participate is not an excuse. And frankly, after what feels like 10 years of listening to Jim Zorn's excuses — I think most Redskins fans are SICK and TIRED of the bull. There's only one way you get back to having a winning team, and it's EXTRA effort from everyone, especially your team leaders. Yes, Campbell got a bit of raw deal to start his career. Talent with no offensive line. It happened with newly signed San Francisco QB David Carr when he was drafted to Houston as well — every other play resulted in a sack. But the difference between Campbell and Carr is simple — extra effort. If you go back and look at ANY given workout, any sideline chatter with the QB's, anywhere that Carr could have been – he was there. THATS why he got signed again so quickly… he showed the ability to lead, be depended on, and the anxiousness to get out there and prove himself. Contractual obligations may get you paid, but they don't get you championships. Time to put in the extra effort and make the most of your opportunities. That's what winners do. |
Pierre-Paul, Others pay the Giants a visit Posted: 16 Apr 2010 03:28 PM PDT Mike Garafolo is reporting that South Florida DE Jason Pierre-Paul visited the Giants earlier this week. Pierre-Paul is projected to be a high first round pick. I would not be a fan of a Pierre-Paul to the Giants. While Pierre-Paul has a world of talent, he is so raw. He's only played one season of major college football. He got by mostly on his athleticism, but that won't fly in the NFL. Pierre-Paul is a classic boom or bust type, and the Giants aren't traditionally interested in those type of players. I think the Giants would be making a mistake in picking Pierre-Paul. For those interested, his prospect profile is here. Garafolo also revealed, in that same article, some more players who visited the Giants. They are: Duke Calhoun, WR, Memphis; O'Brien Schofield, LB, Wisconsin; Mitch Unrein, DE, Utah; and Phillip Dillard, LB, Nebraska. That puts the known total of non-local visits at 15. You are allowed 30. Here are the 15 that we know of: Penn State LB Navorro Bowman |
Don’t be shocked if the Bengals surprise on draft day Posted: 16 Apr 2010 02:31 PM PDT While most of us are expecting safety, tight end, guard and wide receiver to be among the positions the team looks at early in this year's draft, Cincinnati has shown that it will always (a) stick to its draft board and (b) surprise us on draft day. That said, here are three positions the team could surprise and spend an early pick on: Offensive TackleLet's say the second round rolls around and six receivers, five safeties and three tight ends are off the board, but somehow only five offensive tackles are gone. Where would you go with this pick? Look no further than 2006 for evidence of this position's potential. The Bengals had Willie Anderson and Levi Jones established as their tackles when taking Andrew Whitworth in the second round out of LSU. CornerbackWith the cutting of Mike Mickens to make room, expiring contracts of Jonathan Joseph and Leon Hall, and Mike Zimmer saying he wants to upgrade the nickel corner position, signs point to the Bengals taking a cornerback in the draft's first three or four rounds this year. A schedule boasting the re-vamped Ravens (x2), Patriots, Saints, Colts and Chargers also begs for attention to be paid to spread offenses. Running BackMaybe I'm just praying Toby Gerhart falls to the third round comp and becomes a Bengal, but this situation reminds me a bit of 2004. Though Benson is a bit more proven than Rudi Johnson was at the time, the team had its bell cow and solid depth behind him (Kenny Watson then, Brian Leonard and Bernard Scott now). Benson, like Johnson, is entering a contract year and is another strong season from a really good pay day. This is the kind of insurance/bargaining tool we've grown accustomed to seeing from Mike Brown. |
Don’t get excited Cards fans – Roethlisberger’s not coming to Arizona Posted: 16 Apr 2010 02:29 PM PDT File this story by James King of the Phoenix New Times under the "Why Not Go Ahead and Start a Rumor" heading. Although King asserts that the "blogosphere" suggests that the "Arizona Cardinals are a likely team for the two-time Super Bowl champ," this could not be further from the truth. There have been rumors swirling about the Steelers moving Roethlisberger, but there is absolutely no way he will be traded to the Cardinals. King does note that "it seems that anytime a big-name quarterback becomes available — or in this case is rumored to be available — the sports gossip-junkies turn to the teams with the least-impressive quarterbacks and get the rumors started — remember all the Donovan McNabb talk a few weeks ago." The problem is, however, that there doesn't seem to be any other source that even mentions Arizona as a possible team for Roethlisberger. As if it wasn't already clear, the Cardinals announced Leinart as the starter, with Anderson backing him up. St. Pierre, who still hasn't officially signed, is likely to be slotted at third on the depth chart. In addition, the Cardinals have also made it clear they intend to select a quarterback at some point in next week's draft. This leaves no room for a quarterback that has shown a repeated and blatant disrespect for his team's welfare, league policy, and good common sense. |
Williams’ Go Two-for-Two in Seattle: After Signing Mike Williams, Seahawks Sign Reggie Posted: 16 Apr 2010 02:04 PM PDT Earlier today, I wrote about Seattle’s signing of former University of Southern California wide receiver Mike Williams. Williams had been battling with a former Pac-10 rival at the receiver position during the three-day mini camp and now that battle will continue. Per Danny O’Neil of the Seattle Times, the Seahawks signed former Washington Husky Reggie Williams today. As I wrote prior to the tryout for Reggie Williams, Williams was coming into Seattle after off-the-field issues and a decrease in on-the-field production forced the former top-10 draft selection out of Jacksonville, the team that called his name in the 2004 N.F.L. Draft. |
Dolphins ship former first-round WR Ginn to San Fran Posted: 16 Apr 2010 11:18 AM PDT
The pickup comes just a few days after Marshall joins the team, and a few other teams were reportedly interested in Ginn, including the Rams and Bengals. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NFL Gridiron Gab To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.