NFL GridIron Gab Daily Digest |
- Packers Lose to Bears: Reviews & Grades
- Packers: Bloggers “Bears Reviews” Grades
- After OT Miss by Hartley, Saints sign 46-year-old kicker John Carney
- An unexpected QB matchup for McNabb’s return to Philadelphia this Sunday
- Kansas City is not this year’s Denver
- Week Three: Jean-Paul Bergeaux’s List of Things
- Jaguars pick up former Bills QB Trent Edwards
- 3 reasons why I like Carolina’s situation against New Orleans
- Despite knee injury, Rice could play vs Steelers Sunday
- What the Redskins has to do to Survive Sunday in Philadelphia
Packers Lose to Bears: Reviews & Grades Posted: 29 Sep 2010 05:08 AM PDT Jclombardi reviews and grades the Packers loss to Bears. Guest senior writer jclombardi @ http://lombardiave.com
Summary: With the game between the undefeated Packers and Bears going down to the wire, Packers' mistakes and penalties eventually set up the winning field goal to hand the victory to the Bears 20-17. The Packers had 18 penalties, allowed a blocked field goal by Bears DE Peppers, committed crucial special teams mistakes, and had a winning drive stopped by a key fumble leading to closing meltdown and winning Bears field goal at the end of the game. Chicago is 3-0 and alone atop the NFC North. Green Bay fell to 2-1. Game Balls: QB Rodgers. TE Finley. Report Card Grades–Good, Bad, & Ugly (LA vs. SE): Pass Offense—C vs C. With soft protection all day, QB Rodgers had a good game throwing 34 0f 45 passes for 316 yards and two total touchdowns. TE Finley had 9 catches for 115 yards. Finley developed cramps in the fourth quarter during an inopportune time with the Packers having their last offensive drive series. WR Driver had 9 catches for 61 yards. WR Jones 5 catches for 55 yards, but he fumbled on the winning drive and giving the game to the Bears. He has got to be more consistent. RB Jackson had 4 catches for 27 yards. WR Nelson had 3 catches for 20 yards. WR Jennings had 2 catches for 18 yards and one touchdown. He had a disappointing day along with rookie TE Quarless. The offensive unit had eight penalties. The line seemed a bit slow causing their penalties against the physical and emotional Bears. OT Tauscher had another bad first half. He and Clifton had 3 penalties each. OT Clifton gave up a few pressures. C Wells had better days allowing some pressures. G Colledge give up some pressures and two bad runs. OG Sitton had the best day of the group. Rush Offense—D vs C-. Facing a tough schedule, the Packers getting fifteen rushes for 63 yards averaging 4.2 yards is not going to make it for the season and the playoffs. The run blocking was horrible at times, especially by the tight ends. FB Kuhn rushed 6 carries for 31 yards. Less effective, lead running back Jackson had 7 carries for 31. RB Jackson just fails to see the cutback lanes running into tackles. Pass Defense—D+ vs D. Bears quarterback Cutler had a decent day facing pressure in only one half. He three 16 times for 221 yards and one touchdown. The Packers simply had an unimpressive coverage night excluding CB Williams. CB Woodson had several bad plays including another interference call. S Collins dropped two interceptions. Two big interceptions were negated by an interference penalty by rookie safety Burnett and a roughing-the-passer penalty by rookie outside linebacker Zombo. Rookie CB Shields gave up three big offensive plays. LB Chillar gave up several downfield plays to TE Olsen including a touchdown. Rush defense—B+ vs B. The Packers rush defense was good excluding Cutler's scrambling yardage. The Bears had 18 carries for 77 yards averaging a good 4.3 yards. The numbers look good due to Cutler scrambling three times for 37 yards. RB Forte had 11 carries for only 29 yards. Special teams—F vs D-. P Masthay had two of three booming punts, 58 and 57 yards. Yet, his net average was an awful 19 yards. Simply, the coverage units failed to do their jobs outmatched by the more physical and emotional Bears. The Bears' return specialist Hester had a big game returning 28 yards on a bad line-drive 35 yards punts. Then, in the third quarter, Hester returned a 57 yards punt for a 62 yards touchdown. K Crosby kicked one kickoff out-of- bounds. His miss one due to a blocked field goal by DE Peppers. KR Nelson averaged a poor 19.4 yards on five kickoffs, but he had one for 40 yards. Coaching—F vs D. The Packers were outmuscled, outplayed, and outcoached showing a complete lack of professional discipline. They had eighteen penalties and awful special teams coverage. The former falls on head coach Mike McCarthy for the lack of discipline not showing up in a prime-time game. The latter falls on special teams coordinator Slocum who was foolish to let P Masthay kick to Hester. Overall Game—D vs CBS Sportsline Overall Grade–F. The Packers lost a division game that they should have had complete control over if it wasn't for a franchise-tying 18 penalties, two huge special teams miscues and a big fumble by WR James Jones. Packers have only themselves to blame. Commentary: No surprise. Old issues. Some of the veteran players simply had a bad game. Further, the Bears were going to target rookies CB Shields, S Burnett, and OLB Zombo who failed to do an adequate defensive performance. The rookies played like rookies. In the end, we forecast this scenario before the 2010 NFL season. Thus, the Packers need to use a consistent high-powered offense to control the tempo of games until their rookies become more experienced players. Every team will try to take advantage of these weaknesses on the Packers defense. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Packers: Bloggers “Bears Reviews” Grades Posted: 28 Sep 2010 07:57 PM PDT Jclombardi's Packers headlines & grades bloggers' reviews. Guest senior writer jclombardi @ http://lombardiave.com Commentary: Based upon massive research and conversations with the Packers nation, we present the grades about Packers' bloggers reviews with their good, bad, & ugly analysis about the unbearable Bears loss. They are growing on this legendary senior writer and Packers lead blogger:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After OT Miss by Hartley, Saints sign 46-year-old kicker John Carney Posted: 28 Sep 2010 05:02 PM PDT
Sean Payton has a soft spot for Hartley, as he was the kicker that got the Saints to the Super Bowl with a clutch kick in OT for the win over Minnesota, and he also had three field goals in the Super Bowl win over the Colts. Carney has helped Hartley in the past, and you have to wonder how long he will be with the Saints if Hartley can regain his confidence. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An unexpected QB matchup for McNabb’s return to Philadelphia this Sunday Posted: 28 Sep 2010 04:44 PM PDT When Donovan McNabb was traded to the Redskins, we all knew Andy Reid would get to stand behind his new golden boy, Kevin Kolb, and prove that he made the right move. More importantly, Kolb would be able to prove the nay-sayers wrong by leading his Eagles past McNabb and the 'Skins. However, things have changed dramatically since we had all of those thoughts. After being so heavily vested in Kolb leading his team, Reid made the switch to Michael Vick after just two games into the 2010 season. Vick played both well in a relief effort and as the full-time starter. While Kolb "continues his maturation process," Vick will look to lead the team to the playoffs and beyond. Now that the Kolb-McNabb match-up has been put on the back burner, we will be looking at two Vick-McNabb match-ups this year. The two are both big play quarterbacks. We've seen McNabb make some big plays with his arm over the years in Philadelphia. Last week, we saw Vick do much of the same. We've also seen both of these guys have a lot of success making plays with their feet over the years. I think they both are capable of doing so now but prefer to make plays with their arm first. Vick can still run with the best of them and I think McNabb still has a lot of talent with his feet although he's older and we don't see him do it as much anymore. I think it's easy to pinpoint a lot similarities between the two quarterbacks taking the reins this week. However, only one of them will be able to escape Sunday with a win. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kansas City is not this year’s Denver Posted: 28 Sep 2010 02:14 PM PDT Play calling wizardry nothing short of masterful in K.C.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Week Three: Jean-Paul Bergeaux’s List of Things Posted: 28 Sep 2010 02:02 PM PDT Things I Know: Big yardage by a QB in a game is a bad sign. It is conventional wisdom that a big yardage game by a QB was a sign of a winning game. The last few years, it's been the other way around. Look at the top QB yardages performances of the first three weeks. Top 3 out of 4 week 1, loss. Top 3 out of 4 week 2, loss. The top 5 (and 6 out of 7) of week 3, loss. There may be many reasons for this, but it's been a building trend. Big yardage by a running back is a good sign. Meanwhile, the opposite seems to continue to be true for running backs. The top 3 out of 4 week1, win. The top 3 out of 4 week 2, win. The top 4 out of 5 week 3, win. The hot topic lately has been "The NFL is a passing league." It's probably better said, "You need a top QB to pull out tough wins." or something like that. Many will argue that these numbers are the result of being ahead in a game, but that's not the point. Some teams don't have a good enough running game to even "run out the clock" because of the focus on the passing game. Carson Palmer is just not an elite QB. It's done; there shouldn't be an argument anymore. Up through the 2005 and 2006 seasons, Carson Palmer was commonly referred to as an up and coming QB that was on the cusp of being an elite QB. Sometimes Palmer was even outright called elite, sitting right behind Brady and Manning. But that seems like ages ago now. The elite QBs have all had multiple years with a QB passer rating above 100. All of them have a career QB rating above 90. Palmer? Only 2005 for above 100 and a career passer rating below 90. In 2006 Palmer had a 93.9, but since then he hasn't even sniffed the 100 mark. This year he has talent around him again and he actually looks worse. Things I think I know. I think Green Bay needs another RB to have a chance to win it all. The Green Bay Packers were a common SuperBowl pick going into the season, but the loss of Ryan Grant may turn out bigger than it should have been. Brandon Jackson is a third down back that can't carry the load full time. Kuhn is a good back, but is more of short yardage back. It's almost like the Packers didn't have a backup RB at all. Just three role players, full time back, third down back, short yardage back. Without a full time RB that can be depended on, the opposing defenses will just tee off on Aaron Rodgers every play. That offensive line isn't good enough for that. They may still win the division or at least make the playoffs, but without a run game, how do they win in the playoffs?
I think Mike Vick has finally grown up. Everyone seems astonished that Mike Vick is throwing out of the pocket so well now. There is a specific reason. Word was that Mike Vick was lazy when it came to preparation and game film while in Atlanta. That he knew he was good enough to win purely by out-playing opponents and not out-thinking them. When he was out of football for a couple of years, he either was afraid of not having that edge or it finally got through to him that he had to be better prepared. Either way, it matured Vick that much to make him better. He looks this good because he knows what to expect now. Who knows if he'll keep it up, but it makes sense considering what was being reported prior to him getting his chance. I think it might be a while before Brett Favre is back to form. If it happens at all. Yes, the Viking won, but it was in spite of Brett's play. Only one touchdown pass that looked overthrown to a wide open Percy Harvin. 2 INTs, 200 yards and a 68.4 passer rating. Peterson's 160 yards rushing is what won the game. Hopefully for Viking's fans Brett will improve as he gets more in sync with the receivers and Sidney Rice comes back after mid-season, but it wasn't a comeback game for Brett. Long way to go, but still looking for that good game from Brett. Things I know I don’t know. KC can't be this good, can they? It's a long way out, we have 13 games left, but KC just can't be this good. I mean, they added Thomas Jones and Eric Berry. They seem to have gotten a good players in the draft with Dexter McCluster and Tony Moeaki. Suddenly Tyson Jackson looks good and Dwayne Bowe is looking better. But really? I'm not a big Matt Cassell believer and I don't see how this happened after last year's performance. Some of Scott Pioli's moves have confused most people and was supposed to be destined to fail. Yes, the AFC west is pretty mediocre if not just outright bad, but really? What's going on with kickers? It seems like kickers are missing more big kicks in the last few years than in the past. Or is it just a perspective thing. As the old war horses like Morten Anderson, John Carney, Jason Elam, and Gary Anderson fade off in the sunset, are the young bucks ready to step up? Guys like Nick Folk, Matt Prater, Garrett Hartley and Lawrence Tynes are supposed to be the next great line of kickers. But are they? I don't see it, but hey, I don't know for sure. Will we have an undefeated team at 6-0 or beyond? Only three teams left. Pittsburgh faces Baltimore next week and would have to beat Miami to go 6-0. Kansas City faces Indy and Houston in its next two games. Chicago has the best shot with the Giants, Carolina and Seattle in the next three games. But the next two are road games and the Giants could be primed for a comeback win next week at home. Hmmm, maybe Chicago can do it; the next really tough games would be Minn and Miami to go 9-0 and 10-0. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jaguars pick up former Bills QB Trent Edwards Posted: 28 Sep 2010 01:30 PM PDT
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 reasons why I like Carolina’s situation against New Orleans Posted: 28 Sep 2010 12:35 PM PDT Williams’ workload will be full blast in the Superdome Sunday.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Despite knee injury, Rice could play vs Steelers Sunday Posted: 28 Sep 2010 12:16 PM PDT
This is why I thought much of the Willis McGahee trade talk was so silly. Some people referred to McGahee as a "luxury" but in the NFL having several quality running backs is a necessity. Pay close attention to Rice's status in practices this week but I'm sure he'll be a game-time decision for Pittsburgh. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What the Redskins has to do to Survive Sunday in Philadelphia Posted: 28 Sep 2010 12:10 PM PDT Sunday's game against the Rams proved one thing—the Skins are back. This is exactly the kind of bumbling, shoulder-shrugging, excuse-making team that has tormented its fans for the last eight years. Once again, the underdogs come out smelling like roses. Once again, opposing teams break old records and set a few new ones. Once again, the team and its coaches do not respond in any viable way after the fact. Granted, there were some stellar moments. McNabb's 26-yard run was a crowd hit, as were Karem Moore's interception, Devin Thomas' run backs, and Moss's spectacular catches. But they were too few and too far between. I think we all agree that what happened on Sunday was unacceptable. Unfortunately, nobody seems to know what to do about it. I'm not going to pretend that my opinion will get noticed by anyone in the front office, but I'm going to put it out there anyway. From one lifelong fan to the team she loves—here are the five things the Redskins need to improve if they want to get back to a .500 season. 1) Focus. Perhaps the most sickening moment of the game for me (and this is truly a tough call) was when DeAngelo Hall slipped and fell without being touched and without getting anywhere close to the receiver. In recent interviews, Haynesworth claims the team didn't prepare, Fletcher sounds uncertain about how many points the Rams actually scored, and Portis suggests that the team wasn't familiar with all the Rams' personnel. After the heartbreaking loss to the Texans, preparation should have been much more strenuous. And absolute mental focus is a MUST both before the game and during it, the entire four quarters, whether you're in the game or not (Portis). 2) Tackle. Everyone has commented on Kareem Moore's missed tackles from Sunday. But he's not the only one. Part of the problem is that every player has his eye on the marquee instead of on his assignment. Both our defense and our offense need to get their opponents on the ground and out of the mix. Hopefully, the Skins were watching MNF. The Bears' D-line showed everybody how you wrap a guy up. And the Packers were a negative example on how to avoid penalties. 3) Run. More controversy among the players is the last thing this team needs right now. Off-season deals have proven that we don't have a better option than Portis. Make him the definitive starter and get that chip off his back. His teammates have confidence him. The coach (DC code for owner) needs to share it. Torain looks like a good backup, but don't make the mistake of trying to train up a new guy in the middle of the season, again! Speaking of which… 4) …get consistent. Haynesworth or Kemoeatu? Portis or Torain? Landry, Doughty, and / or Moore? Pick a roster and develop it. When Portis sits on the sidelines with his baseball cap on and his knees crossed, when Portis later says that he did what they told him to do, that doesn't sound like the Portis we know and love, the Portis who does what needs to be done without being asked, as many times as it takes. Yeah, Stephon Heyer makes false starts. So did Chris Samuels—he was good for at least 5 yards per game. But if Heyer were playing regularly, I don't think we'd see those types of errors. He's a good player who can be consistent when he's given the chance. Speaking of Heyer, let's talk about injuries. They happen: witness the Rams, who lost four key players, including their running back, Steven Jackson and their two safeties. But like the Rams, we need contingency game plans, we need backups to FOCUS (see #1), and we to pay more attention to training and conditioning throughout the week. 5) Develop the Red Zone. The Redskins scored one touchdown in the entire game, from 21 yards out (thanks Moss!). We were in the red zone three times and were not able to convert that position once. Sound familiar? Like in the home opener last year against the Rams when we were only able to score three field goals and Campbell was forced to take a knee on the five yard line in the fourth quarter rather than risk turning over the ball. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NFL Gridiron Gab To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.