NFL GridIron Gab Daily Digest |
- Champ Stays In Mile High City
- Ronde’s Back
- Five Free Agents That Can Turn Around A Franchise’s Fortunes In 2011
- Giants RB’s Jacobs and Bradshaw — Who Goes and Who Stays?
- Ravens RB Willis McGahee Expected to Get Cut?
- Raiders to Keep OLB Kamerion Wimbley Under Contract
Posted: 22 Feb 2011 03:41 PM PST A Future Hall Of Famer Agrees To Stay Put In Denver Champ, Elway, Tim Tebow: the foundation for the Broncos franchise is set with a trio of winners and consummate professionals. The Denver Broncos will retain the services of All-Pro cornerback Champ Bailey, by inking him to a new four-year extension, according to general manager John Elway. The Hall of Fame QB made the news official on his Twitter account, concerning the club keeping the 10-time Pro Bowler. “We are thrilled to announce that the Broncos have agreed to terms on a new four-year contract with cornerback Champ Bailey,” Elway said. “Champ is truly one of the NFL’s elite players, a 10-time Pro Bowler who is playing at the absolute highest level. “The commitment and loyalty that Champ has shown to the Broncos, the city of Denver and this region is exemplary. We’re fortunate to have Champ with the Broncos for a long time. This is a GREAT day for our entire organization and our fans.” |
Posted: 22 Feb 2011 12:55 PM PST
The Bucs’ all-time leader in interceptions (40) was re-signed Tuesday. Mark Domenik had this to say: "Ronde Barber, at his age, is a phenomenal football player, and he defies the position because of how well he takes care of his body and his mind week-in and week-out during the offseason and regular season. He just defies logic, and he does that because of his commitment to his training, and then his instincts and his ball skills take over. It's always fun and it's exciting to continue to see him play at such a high level, and he's really a guy that I felt could have had a Pro Bowl opportunity [in 2010], or certainly should have been an alternate, in my opinion. So I'm really proud of him, because corners don't play in the National Football League at his age, but he does. You can't tell if he's 30 or if he's 35. You wouldn't know the difference." |
Five Free Agents That Can Turn Around A Franchise’s Fortunes In 2011 Posted: 22 Feb 2011 12:36 PM PST Will Malcom Be An “X” Factor For A Contending Club In ‘11? With Impact Contributors To Be Had In This Year’s Free Agent Class, Which Players Testing The Free Agency Waters Will Make The Biggest Splash Changing Teams? Note to consider: The following free agent prospects are more along the line of under-the-radar status, with the exception of DeAngelo Williams. I left out Nnamdi Asmougha; the premiere sought-after free agent. I have him going to the NFC East with the Dallas Cowboys.
|
Giants RB’s Jacobs and Bradshaw — Who Goes and Who Stays? Posted: 22 Feb 2011 11:43 AM PST Although RB Ahmad Bradshaw is not currently under contract, and will be a free agent when a new CBA is reached, he will likely be the Giants' top off-season priority. They will try and resign Bradshaw, however, they won't use the Franchise Tag on him. The issue, however, is can you keep both Ahmad Bradshaw and Brandon Jacobs. The Answer: Probably not. While these two are best friends, even calling each other brothers, the Giants might not be able to keep both. Jacobs is due $4.65 million, none of which is guaranteed. If the Giants' sign Bradshaw, which they likely intend to do, can they allocate that $4.65 million and probably about then some to Ahmad Bradshaw, assuming there's a salary cap next season? You know Jacob's isn't taking a pay cut, and Bradshaw will be paid handsomely for a solid season. So who goes? Let's take a look below: Pros to Keeping Bradshaw: The young 24 year old had has his best season this year racking up 1,235 yards with 8 touchdowns on the ground. He also averaged 4.5 yards a carry, which is a great number. Although he had off-season surgery to clean up his ankle, he did last the entire season, something people weren't sure he'd be able to do once he was named the starter during training camp. He did this all, in his first season starting. He also add's value in the receiving game, catching 47 passes for 314 yards. He a solid blocker out of the backfield, too. If there is a new CBA and he's a RFA then he'll be cheap. However, he'll likely be a UFA. Cons to Keeping Bradshaw: Bradshaw had terrible fumbling woes, coughing up the ball up seven times, losing the ball on six of them. As a result of the fumbling woes, Bradshaw was delegated to the bench in favor of backup RB Brandon Jacobs. Bradshaw's health was also a problem, too. While he didn't miss any games, his body began wearing down towards the end of the year and he wasn't as effective. Although he's 24, can he consistently last as a stater? He needed off-season surgery on his ankle again. He had both ankles done last year, too. Bradshaw started the year red hot, averaging 4.7 yards per carries in games 1-8 with six touchdowns. However, in games 9-16, he averaged a measly 3.8 carries with two touchdowns. Another sign of wear and tear. Pros to Keeping Brandon Jacobs: Jacobs started the season on the bench but ended up taking the starting job by storm. Once he got the starting job, he never looked back. He had back-to-back 100-yard games and found the end-zone three times. He ended up rushing for 823 yards on the season with 9 touchdowns. He had a ridiculous number of 5.6 yards per carry. Imagine what he could do starting full-time, again. Cons to Keeping Brandon Jacobs: He's a pain in the rear end. When he wasn't starting, he was pouting. He was fined $10,000 for throwing his helmet into the stands after a loss. On the last day of the season, Jacobs cursed off the media before leaving. He want's to be starting. Make no mistake about it. If not in New York, then elsewhere. He's due $4.65 million dollars next season. Not many teams would take on his big contract, though. Would the Giants' cut him? Who knows. It also depends on the CBA. There is a chance the Giants' could keep both, but it's unlikely. The Giants are at there best when they have two backs, a 1-2 punch, per say. Sometimes even a 1-2-3 punch. If they let one go, which they may, then they will look to draft one. The best scenario possible would be keeping both and keeping Jacobs a happy camper while paying Bradshaw. It's very, very possible. We don't know any parameters of anything right now without a new CBA. Time will tell my friends, time will tell. |
Ravens RB Willis McGahee Expected to Get Cut? Posted: 22 Feb 2011 11:28 AM PST From the Baltimore Sun:
This doesn't seem shocking considering McGahee will be a back-up to Ray Rice and hardly worth paying double his past salary. This means that the Ravens backfield could have a drastically different look in 2011. Le'Ron McClain's career as a Raven could be over as well as he will command a much bigger contract to secure his services and the team recently signed Jason McKie to a 1-year deal as insurance. The three headed monster rushing attack that helped propel Baltimore to the 2009 AFC Title game appears to be history though two of those heads got smaller over the last two seasons. If McGahee does go what direction should the Ravens go in replacing him? Should they look to the draft, turn their attention to free agency, or look at Jalen Parmele for carries? |
Raiders to Keep OLB Kamerion Wimbley Under Contract Posted: 22 Feb 2011 11:07 AM PST
Adam Caplan of FOXSports.com reports the Raiders have informed the starting OLB that they have bought back the final year of his rookie contract according to his agent Joe Linta. Linta said last week that the team would send their intention by certified letter. The team had until the end of the day on March 3 to use the buyback option. The Raiders, who acquired the pass rusher from the Cleveland Browns on Mar. 14, 2010 for a third-round pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, was able to void the final season of his Contract because he met minimum playing time requirements. His salary for 2011 was $635,000 before the void. |
You are subscribed to email updates from NFL Gridiron Gab To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.